1 Introduction
This site is adjunct to the Zarahemla Model of Book of Mormon geography website at zchm.theholyscriptures.info. A request I get, not related to geography per se, is for information on Book of Mormon evidence in terms of discoveries in the ground. It turns out there is a LOT of artifacts and writings that have been found. This site is small start in presenting that evidence and what you find here is just a fraction of the total evidences and information, so I expect this website to grow.
- Jay Mackley
1.1 Table of Contents
Close All — Open All — Table of ContentsSection Revised: 08 June 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(If sections closed then click Open All to enable internal links)
2 Book of Mormon Internal Evidences
2.1 Translation Process
There is controversy and conflicting testimony when it comes to the actual translation process. False accounts come from disaffected former members of the Church with a personal agenda to push (like Emma Smith) and accounts of the process also vary widely from one telling to the next, depending on the audience (like David Whitmer11). However, evidence indicates that only Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery had any direct experience with the translation process. Fortunately their testimony is consistent, clear and concise, as in the Wentworth letter5 and other authoritative statements1. Therefore the testimony of Joseph and Oliver must be paramount. They testified the translation was: 1) Done by the power of God; 2) Included reading the golden plates; and 3) Involved the use of the Urim and Thummim -- also called the Holy Interpreters. The only real question is the role of the Urim and Thummim in the translation process.
Accounts that describe the translation process using a dark "seer stone" in a hat were introduced by the anti-Mormon book "Mormonism Unvailed" and repeated by enemies and disaffected former members of the church in Joseph Smiths lifetime. There are also claims that "seer stone" and "Urim and Thummim" were referred to interchangeably as the same thing. This is patently false in the writings of Joseph and Oliver and the scripture10 is clear. We must take the official testimony of Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, and the Lord Himself and reject the tales of enemies and apostates – as Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery did in their day9. Below is the official canonized statement on the matter. The seer stone is conspicuously absent and is also not to be found anywhere in the scriptures or in the writings of Joseph Smith or in the writings of Oliver Cowdery as being part of the translation process.
Doctrine and Covenants 17
1 BEHOLD, I say unto you, that you must rely upon my word, which if you do with full purpose of heart, you shall have a view of the plates, and also of the breastplate, the sword of Laban, the Urim and Thummim, which were given to the brother of Jared upon the mount, when he talked with the Lord face to face, and the miraculous directors which were given to Lehi while in the wilderness, on the borders of the Red Sea.
2 And it is by your faith that you shall obtain a view of them, even by that faith which was had by the prophets of old.
3 And after that you have obtained faith, and have seen them with your eyes, you shall testify of them, by the power of God;
4 And this you shall do that my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., may not be destroyed, that I may bring about my righteous purposes unto the children of men in this work.
5 And ye shall testify that you have seen them, even as my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., has seen them; for it is by my power that he has seen them, and it is because he had faith.
6 And he has translated the book, even that part which I have commanded him, and as your Lord and your God liveth it is true.
...
9 And I, Jesus Christ, your Lord and your God, have spoken it unto you, that I might bring about my righteous purposes unto the children of men. Amen.
Oliver Cowderys testimony is also clear and unambiguous. For example, when he returned to the Church, he spoke at Council Bluffs and said:
Millennial Star, Aug. 20 1859, 544
I wrote, with my own pen, the entire Book of Mormon (save a few pages) as it fell from the lips of the Prophet Joseph Smith, as he translated it by the gift and power of God, by the means of the Urim and Thummim, or, as it is called by that book, 'holy interpreters.' I beheld with my eyes, and handled with my hands, the gold plates from which it was transcribed. I also saw with my eyes and handled with my hands the 'holy interpreters.' That book is true. Sidney Rigdon did not write it; Mr. Spaulding did not write it; I wrote it myself as it fell from the lips of the Prophet.
There is very strong evidence, based both on testimony and examination of the original manuscripts, that the translation process consisted of a one-time dictation1a,1b,1c which supports the idea that Joseph read off the English words as displayed on the Urim and Thummim Interpretors. This also makes sense when considering the remarkable speed of the translation. It also provides an explanation as to why Joseph did not revise himself – as Royal Skousen discovered in his study of the original manuscripts. Some have argued for a loose translation and that the young Joseph Smith at age 23 had read many books and translated the Book of Mormon into correct Biblical English using his own lexicon. However, this theory does not match the evidence. There were no do-overs, no narrative revision, no unlimited lexicon available to the 19th century Joseph Smith.
Joseph Smith himself indicated that he could read the hieroglyphics of the plates:
"I translated the Book of Mormon from hieroglyphics, the knowledge of which was lost to the world, in which wonderful event I stood alone, an unlearned youth, to combat the worldly wisdom and multiplied ignorance of eighteen centuries" ... (History of the Church, 6:74).
It is believed, for good reasons, that the young Joseph Smith studied2a the language2b of the plates for as much as six months2c, was tutored by angelic messengers3 and thus could actually read and understand the logographic symbols on the plates2d based on his own study2e which was augmented with queries to the Urim and Thummim2e. I do believe this is true based on the historical record and also Section 9 of the Doctrine and Covenants4. That the translation process involved a personal understanding the engravings on the plates was also reiterated by the Lord to Oliver Cowdery when he said:
Doctrine & Covenants 8
1 Oliver Cowdery, verily, verily, I say unto you, that assuredly as the Lord liveth, who is your God and your Redeemer, even so surely shall you receive a knowledge of whatsoever things you shall ask in faith, with an honest heart, believing that you shall receive a knowledge concerning the engravings of old records, which are ancient, which contain those parts of my scripture of which has been spoken by the manifestation of my Spirit.
However, having a knowledge of the "Reformed Egyptian" characters on the plates does not explain a one-time dictation into a complex Biblical style English with no revisions. This is where, in my opinion, the role of the Urim and Thummim5 comes in. Joseph Smith had a preparation and talent for translating the written meaning to his own understanding and then the role of the Urim and Thummim (also called "Interpreters"6) was to convert/interpret (consecutive interpreting) that understanding into the precise Hebrew-like language constructs and Bible-like vocabulary that is now found in the Book of Mormon. For most people the tendency is to carelessly conflate interpreting and translating to mean the same thing. This is clearly not the case. The 1828 Webster dictionary defines the words "translate" and "interpret" as:
Translate: to turn into one's own or another language (which is exactly what Joseph Smiths study and effort did)
Interpret: to explain or tell the meaning of – present in understandable terms. (which is exactly what the Urim and Thummim interpreters did)
The title page of the Book of Mormon says "The interpretation thereof by the gift (gift: Something that is bestowed voluntarily) of God." Translating and Interpreting are two words conveying two separate processes and they should not be conflated! That the interpretation was a "gift" from God in form of written words is stated in the history of Lucy Mack Smith where she says:
Lucy Mack Smith, History, 1844–1845
In the mean time Joseph was 150 miles distant and knew naught of the matter except an intimation that was given through the urim and thummim for as he one morning applied them to his eyes to look upon the record instead of the words of the book being given him he was commanded to write a letter to one David Whitmer this man Joseph had never seen but he was instructed to say to him that he must come with his team immediately in order to convey Joseph and Oliver back to his house which was 135 miles that they might remain with him there until the translation should be completed ...
This concept of the final wording being "given" as a gift also explains why it was a one-time dictation instead of the normal multiple attempts required to refine the wording. Multiple attempts and revisions would be needed (double interpretation) for interpreting such a complex text without the text being provided by the Urim and Thummim. Nobody, on their own, could get the wording exactly right the very first time with no revision. In my opinion only God could do that7 and I believe God did provide the exact wording via the Urim and Thummim. This was a blessing not only to Joseph Smith but it also fulfilled prophecy given by the Lord to the ancient Nephite prophets8.
Oliver Cowdery also reportedly testified in court that Joseph dictated the text of Book of Mormon by reading in English from the Urim and Thummim:
Evangelical Magazine 1831-04-09: Vol 2 Issue 15, p 120
Oliver Cowdery, one of the three witnesses to the book, testified under oath, that said Smith found with the plates, from which he translated his book, two transparent stones, resembling glass, set in silver bows. That by looking through these, he was able to read in English, the reformed Egyptian characters, which were engraved on the plates. (https://archive.org/details/sim_evangelical-magazine-and-gospel-advocate_1831-04-09_2_15/page/n7/mode/1up)
Therefore the wording as it came from the lips of Joseph Smith was a perfectly accurate interpretation that came for free as a gift from God. However, emendations were nevertheless needed for the following reasons: 1) Errors were introduced in the transcription of the original manuscript (this has been well documented by Royal Skousen); 2) Errors were introduced in the creation of the printers manuscript; 3) punctuation and wording, sometimes incorrect, was introduced by the printers assistant John Gilbert; 4) the perfectly accurate interpretation included Hebrew idioms and sentence constructs of Biblical English that were ungrammatical in modern English; and 5) errors were also introduced by the original writers and abridgers of the Nephite record (they admit this) and so some clarifications were added (rarely for this reason) by Joseph Smith. For all the many details of each of these emendations over the years, I refer you to the 20 year work of Royal Skousen "The Book of Mormon - The Earliest Text" and the five volumes of "The Book of Mormon Critical Text Project".
The Book of Mormon Critical Text Project
Volume I: The Original Manuscript of the Book of Mormon
Volume II: the Printer's Manuscript of the Book of Mormon
Volume III: The History of the Text of the Book of Mormon
Volume III Parts 3 and 4: The Nature of the Original Language of the Book of Mormon
Volume IV: Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon
Volume IV Part One: 1 Nephi 1--2 Nephi 11
Volume IV Part Two: 2 Nephi 12 – Mosiah 13
Volume IV Part Three: Mosiah 14 – Alma 17
Volume IV Part Four: Alma 18–51
Volume IV Part Five: Alma 52 – 3 Nephi 7
Volume IV Part Six: 3 Nephi 8 – Moroni 10
Volume V: A Complete Electronic Collation of the Book of Mormon
I believe the original text of the Book of Mormon to be the ultimate "tight" translation. Every word and every spelling is significant and precise as it came from the lips of Joseph Smith. That is also my experience and testimony as I have studied the text in regard to the geography of the Book of Mormon.
Below is a layout demonstrating the translation process as I have described it and showing the periods for each phase of the translation effort. All translation efforts, inspired or not, go through these phases in order to reach the final product. Only the role of the Urim & Thummim is unique. This process of Book of Mormon translation I call the TITE process: TranslationInterpretationTranscriptionEmendation
.
<-------Translational Activity-----><-----Transcriptional Activity----->
Translation--->Interpretation------>Transcription------->Emendation---->
Joseph Smith-->Holy Interpreters--->Oliver Cowdery------>John Gilbert
study & prep Urim & Thummim others... Joseph Smith
Royal Skousen
others...
Within the TITE process, by using the Urim and Thummim for Interpretation, over time Joseph became familiar and fluent with the language of scripture. Because of this training, later revelations in Doctrine & Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price were received and interpreted without the aid of the Urim and Thummim. However in these cases (when not using Urim and Thummim) he manually reviewed the text and made revisions until the interpretation/wording was accurate to the revelation received.
The graphic below shows the origin and contents of each section of the plates and how they made it to the published version of the Book of Mormon.
Harmony: Joseph learns "reformed Egyptian" from large plates of Nephi: 09/22/1827 to 04/12/1828 Harmony: Joseph translates from the large plates of Nephi, named 116 pages: 04/12/1828 to 06/14/1828 Harmony: Joseph did not have the plates or Urim and Thummim, no translations: 06/15/1828 to 09/22/1828 Harmony: Joseph translates a little of the large plates with misc. scribes: 09/22/1828 to 04/04/1829 Harmony: Joseph finishes the large plates of Nephi with Oliver Cowdery: 04/07/1829 to 05/2?/1829 Fayette: Joseph translates small plates of Nephi with Oliver Cowdery: 06/0?/1829 to 06/2?/1829
The Hill Cumorah plates repository is described by Mormon:
Mormon 6:6
6 And it came to pass that when we had gathered in all our people in one to the land of Cumorah, behold I, Mormon, began to be old; and knowing it to be the last struggle of my people, and having been commanded of the Lord that I should not suffer the records which had been handed down by our fathers, which were sacred, to fall into the hands of the Lamanites, (for the Lamanites would destroy them) therefore I made this record out of the plates of Nephi, and hid up in the hill Cumorah all the records which had been entrusted to me by the hand of the Lord, save it were these few plates which I gave unto my son Moroni.
Orson Pratt, Heber C. Kimball, Wilford Woodruff and Brigham Young all spoke of the Hill Cumorah hill repository and its contents. The most detailed statement comes from Brigham Young who testified of it in 1877.
President Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol 19, p 38
I lived right in the country where the plates were found from which the Book of Mormon was translated, and I know a great many things pertaining to that country. I believe I will take the liberty to tell you of another circumstance that will be as marvelous as anything can be. This is an incident in the life of Oliver Cowdery, but he did not take the liberty of telling such things in meeting as I take. I tell these things to you, and I have a motive for doing so. I want to carry them to the ears of my brethren and sisters, and to the children also, that they may grow to an understanding of some things that seem to be entirely hidden from the human family. Oliver Cowdery went with the Prophet Joseph when he deposited these plates. Joseph did not translate all of the plates; there was a portion of them sealed, which you can learn from the Book of Doctrine and Covenants. When Joseph got the plates, the angel instructed him to carry them back to the hill Cumorah, which he did. Oliver says that when Joseph and Oliver went there, the hill opened, and they walked into a cave, in which there was a large and spacious room. He says he did not think, at the time, whether they had the light of the sun or artificial light; but that it was just as light as day. They laid the plates on a table; it was a large table that stood in the room. Under this table there was a pile of plates as much as two feet high, and there were altogether in this room more plates than probably many wagon loads; they were piled up in the corners and along the walls. The first time they went there the sword of Laban hung upon the wall; but when they went again it had been taken down and laid upon the table across the gold plates; it was unsheathed, and on it was written these words: “This sword will never be sheathed again until the kingdoms of this world become the kingdom of our God and his Christ.” I tell you this as coming not only from Oliver Cowdery, but others who were familiar with it, and who understood it just as well as we understand coming to this meeting, enjoying the day, and by and by we separate and go away, forgetting most of what is said, but remembering some things. So is it with other circumstances in life. I relate this to you, and I want you to understand it. I take this liberty of referring to those things so that they will not be forgotten and lost. (Discourse by President Brigham Young, delivered at a Special Conference Held at Farmington, for the Purpose of Organizing a Stake of Zion for the County of Davis, on Sunday Afternoon, June 17, 1877)
1 See the Wentworth Letter, also Doctrine and Covenants 3:19Doctrine and Covenants 3:19
19 And for this very purpose are these plates preserved, which contain these records--that the promises of the Lord might be fulfilled, which he made to his people; , 5:4Doctrine and Covenants 5:4
1 BEHOLD, I say unto you, that as my servant Martin Harris has desired a witness at my hand, that you, my servant Joseph Smith, Jun. , have got the plates of which you have testified and borne record that you have received of me;
2 And now, behold, this shall you say unto him--he who spake unto you, said unto you: I, the Lord, am God, and have given these things unto you, my servant Joseph Smith, Jun. , and have commanded you that you should stand as a witness of these things;
3 And I have caused you that you should enter into a covenant with me, that you should not show them except to those persons to whom I commanded you; and you have no power over them except I grant it unto you.
4 And you have a gift to translate the plates; and this is the first gift that I bestowed upon you; and I have commanded that you should pretend (as in: to presume; venture) to no other gift until my purpose is fulfilled in this; for I will grant unto you no other gift until it is finished., 10:38-46Doctrine and Covenants 10:38-46
38 And now, verily I say unto you, that an account of those things that you have written, which have gone out of your hands, is engraven upon the plates of Nephi;
39 Yea, and you remember it was said in those writings that a more particular account was given of these things upon the plates of Nephi.
40 And now, because the account which is engraven upon the plates of Nephi is more particular concerning the things which, in my wisdom, I would bring to the knowledge of the people in this account--
41 Therefore, you shall translate the engravings which are on the plates of Nephi, down even till you come to the reign of king Benjamin, or until you come to that which you have translated, which you have retained;
42 And behold, you shall publish it as the record of Nephi; and thus I will confound those who have altered my words.
43 I will not suffer that they shall destroy my work; yea, I will show unto them that my wisdom is greater than the cunning of the devil.
44 Behold, they have only got a part, or an abridgment of the account of Nephi.
45 Behold, there are many things engraven upon the plates of Nephi which do throw greater views upon my gospel; therefore, it is wisdom in me that you should translate this first part of the engravings of Nephi, and send forth in this work.
46 And, behold, all the remainder of this work does contain all those parts of my gospel which my holy prophets, yea, and also my disciples, desired in their prayers should come forth unto this people., 17:1-6Doctrine and Covenants 17:1-6
1 BEHOLD, I say unto you, that you must rely upon my word, which if you do with full purpose of heart, you shall have a view of the plates, and also of the breastplate, the sword of Laban, the Urim and Thummim, which were given to the brother of Jared upon the mount, when he talked with the Lord face to face, and the miraculous directors which were given to Lehi while in the wilderness, on the borders of the Red Sea.
2 And it is by your faith that you shall obtain a view of them, even by that faith which was had by the prophets of old.
3 And after that you have obtained faith, and have seen them with your eyes, you shall testify of them, by the power of God;
4 And this you shall do that my servant Joseph Smith, Jun. , may not be destroyed, that I may bring about my righteous purposes unto the children of men in this work.
5 And ye shall testify that you have seen them, even as my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., has seen them; for it is by my power that he has seen them, and it is because he had faith.
6 And he has translated the book, even that part which I have commanded him, and as your Lord and your God liveth it is true.
1a The work of translation proceeded haltingly through 1828. Joseph's wife, Emma, and others served as scribes until the spring of 1829, when Oliver Cowdery took over, recording the bulk of the 275,000-word text from Joseph's dictation, concluding near the end of June 1829, a period of about 60 days. (see Church History, ChurchOfJesusChrist.org)
1b These were days never to be forgotten-to sit under the sound of a voice dictated by the inspiration of heaven, awakened the utmost gratitude of this bosom! Day after day I continued, uninterrupted, to write from his mouth as he translated" (Messenger and Advocate 1 [Oct. 1834]:14)
1c All witnesses of the translation stated that Joseph Smith dictated the text of the Book of Mormon. This claim is supported by certain errors in the original manuscript which clearly resulted from the scribe mishearing what Joseph had dictated. ... Evidence from the original manuscript supports the traditional belief that Joseph Smith received a revealed text by means of the interpreters. ... In fact, the occurrence of non-English Hebraisms such as the if-and construction strongly suggests that the text was tightly controlled down to the level of the word at least. This tight control is also supported by the consistent phraseology in the original text. And the spelling of names such as Coriantumr suggests that control could be imposed down to the very letter. (How Joseph Smith Translated the Book of Mormon, Royal Skousen, pp 25,30)
2a ...Joseph began to make arrangements to accomplish the translation of the Record; And the first step which he was instructed to take in regard to this matter, was, to take a Fac-Simile of the characters composing the alphabet: which characters were called reformed Egyptian... (Lucy Mack Smith History, 1845, pp 117,122, Joseph Smith Papers)
2b for truth is a matter of fact — and the fact is, by the power of God I translated the book of Mormon from hieroglyphics; the knowledge of which was lost to the world. In which wonderful event, I stood alone, an unlearned youth, to combat the worldly wisdom and multiplied ignorance of eighteen centuries. (James Arlington Bennet letter, Joseph Smith Papers)
2c I commenced copying the characters of all the plates. I copyed a considerable number of them and by means of the Urim and Thummin I translated some of them which I did between the time I arrived at the house of my wife's father in the month of December, and the February following. (Lucy Mack Smith History, 1845, pp 117,122, Joseph Smith Papers)
2d With "true alphabet" languages, like English, one needs to generally speak the language in order to read it. However, for Pictographic and Logographic writing systems, this is not the case. See below. The "Reformed Egyptian" (Mormon 9:32-33Mormon 9:32-33
32 And now, behold, we have written this record according to our knowledge, in the characters which are called among us the reformed Egyptian, being handed down and altered by us, according to our manner of speech.
33 And if our plates had been sufficiently large we should have written in Hebrew; but the Hebrew hath been altered by us also; and if we could have written in Hebrew, behold, ye would have had no imperfection in our record. ) of the plates was likely an altered/customized form of the Egyptian Demotic. The beautiful Egyptian Hieroglyphic's were used for monuments and Demotic was the everyday "cursive" form, much simpler to write – and designed for parchment. Mormon explains that he used "Reformed Egyptian" that had been altered by the Nephites. One reason it had to be altered is that it was designed to be engraven on metal plates rather than parchment. That it may also have been primarily logographic is clear when Mormon explains it was much shorter than the Hebrew (Mormon 9:32-33Mormon 9:32-33
32 And now, behold, we have written this record according to our knowledge, in the characters which are called among us the reformed Egyptian, being handed down and altered by us, according to our manner of speech.
33 And if our plates had been sufficiently large we should have written in Hebrew; but the Hebrew hath been altered by us also; and if we could have written in Hebrew, behold, ye would have had no imperfection in our record. ).
In the context of the Book of Mormon it is useful to understand the basics of the following writing systems
Pictographic/ideographic writing systems:
- There is no single way to read them, because there is no one-to-one correspondence between symbol and language.
- Only the author of a text can read it with any certainty, and it may be said that they are interpreted rather than read.
- Such scripts often work best as mnemonic aids for oral texts, or as outlines that will be fleshed out in speech.
- - Examples: Aztec, Mixtec, other Mesoamerican writing systems with the exception of Maya Hieroglyphs.
Logographic writing systems
- Glyphs (A symbol, such as a stylized figure or arrow on a public sign, that imparts information nonverbally) represent words or morphemes (meaningful components of words, as in mean-ing-ful), rather than phonetic elements.
- No logographic script is composed solely of logograms (A written symbol representing an entire spoken word without expressing its pronunciation; for example, 4 is read as "four" in English, "quattro" in Italian.). All contain graphemes that represent phonetic (sound-based) elements as well.
- Many glyphs are purely phonetic, whereas others function as either logograms or phonetic elements, depending on context.
- Consonant-based logographies
- Examples: Hieroglyphic, Hieratic, and Demotic — the writing systems of Ancient Egypt. - Syllable-based logographies
- Examples: Cuneiform, Chinese, Japanese, Mayan.
Abjad writing systems
- Script containing symbols for consonants only, or where vowels are optionally written with diacritics.
- - Examples: Arabian, Aramaic, Hebrew.
True Alphabets writing systems
- A true alphabet contains separate letters (not diacritic marks) for both consonants and vowels..
- - Examples: Coptic Egyptian, Cyrillic - Eastern Slavic languages, Greek, Latin-Roman (current western and central European languages).
2e
PGP, Joseph Smith History 1
62 By this timely aid was I enabled to reach the place of my destination in Pennsylvania; and immediately after my arrival there I commenced copying the characters off the plates. I copied a considerable number of them, and by means of the Urim and Thummim I translated some of them, which I did between the time I arrived at the house of my wife's father, in the month of December, and the February following.
3 And when Joseph Smith was raised up as a Prophet of God, Mormon, Moroni, Nephi and others of the ancient Prophets who formerly lived on this Continent, and Peter and John and others who lived on the Asiatic Continent, came to him and communicated to him certain principles pertaining to the Gospel of the Son of God. (John Taylor, Journal of Discourses, April 8 1875, Vol 17, p 374)
4 (revelation given through Joseph Smith to Oliver Cowdery)
Doctrine and Covenants 9
7 Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.
8 But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.
9 But if it be not right you shall have no such feelings, but you shall have a stupor of thought that shall cause you to forget the thing which is wrong; therefore, you cannot write that which is sacred save it be given you from me.
10 Now, if you had known this you could have translated; nevertheless, it is not expedient that you should translate now. (Doctrine and Covenants, 9:7-10).
5 "With the records was found a curious instrument, which the ancients called 'Urim and Thummim', which consisted of two transparent stones set in the rim of a bow fastened to a breast plate. Through the medium of the Urim and Thummim I translated the record by the gift and power of God" (Joseph Smith, Wentworth Letter, History of the Church, 4:537).
6 Ether 4:5
5 Wherefore the Lord hath commanded me to write them; and I have written them. And he commanded me that I should seal them up; and he also hath commanded that I should seal up the interpretation thereof; wherefore I have sealed up the interpreters, according to the commandment of the Lord.
7 2 Nephi 29:2
2 And also, that I may remember the promises which I have made unto thee, Nephi, and also unto thy father, that I would remember your seed; and that the words of your seed should proceed forth out of my mouth unto your seed; and my words shall hiss forth unto the ends of the earth, for a standard unto my people, which are of the house of Israel;
7+8 Ether 12:
23 And I said unto him: Lord, the Gentiles will mock at these things, because of our weakness in writing; for Lord thou hast made us mighty in word by faith, but thou hast not made us mighty in writing; for thou hast made all this people that they could speak much, because of the Holy Ghost which thou hast given them;
24 And thou hast made us that we could write but little, because of the awkwardness of our hands. Behold, thou hast not made us mighty in writing like unto the brother of Jared, for thou madest him that the things which he wrote were mighty even as thou art, unto the overpowering of man to read them.
25 Thou hast also made our words powerful and great, even that we cannot write them; wherefore, when we write we behold our weakness, and stumble because of the placing of our words; and I fear lest the Gentiles shall mock at our words.
26 And when I had said this, the Lord spake unto me, saying: Fools mock, but they shall mourn; and my grace is sufficient for the meek, that they shall take no advantage of your weakness; (Book of Mormon, Ether 12:23-26).
9JS-H: 1
61 The excitement, however, still continued, and rumor with her thousand tongues was all the time employed in circulating falsehoods about my father's family, and about myself. If I were to relate a thousandth part of them, it would fill up volumes. (PGP, Joseph Smith History 1:63).
10PGP, Joseph Smith History 1:35
35 Also, that there were two stones in silver bows—and these stones, fastened to a breastplate, constituted what is called the Urim and Thummim—deposited with the plates; and the possession and use of these stones were what constituted “seers” in ancient or former times; and that God had prepared them for the purpose of translating the book. (PGP, Joseph Smith History 1:35).
11Joseph Smith Foundation
As a disaffected former member of the Church David Whitmer often produced wildly contradicting testimony about the translation process of the Book of Mormon to various newspapers. Apparently he often changed the story to fit the expectations of audiences. Below is a table documenting conflicting testimony from JosephSmithFoundation.org. See David Whitmer: Man of Contradictions for the complete table with all working links.
Table 1. Various Descriptions of the Instrument of Translation
| Footnote | Date and Source | Instrument used to Translate | Description of Instrument |
| 6 | 1878 P. Wilhelm Poulson | Urim and Thummim | Two white stones cased in spectacles of silver, stones separated more than normal spectacles |
| 7 | 1879 Thomas Wood Smith | Urim and Thummim | |
| 10 | 1879 J. L. Traughber Jr. | Seer Stone | Dark colored, opaque stone placed in hat, put face in hat to exclude light |
| 11 | 1880 Thomas Wood Smith | Retraction of Urim and Thummim method described in interview in footnote (see footnote 7) | |
| 12 | 1880 Eri B. Mullin | Urim and Thummim | Looked like spectacles |
| 9 | 1881 Kansas City Journal | Interpreters | Two small stones of chocolate color, egg shaped and perfectly smooth, not transparent |
| 13 | 1881 David Whitmer to the Kansas City Journal | Retracted the Kansas City Journal Story about the Interpreters and said Joseph used a sun stone | Not two stones, but one stone was used. Said he did not say Joseph used the interpreters. |
| 14 | 1881 Chicago Times | Urim and Thummim | Small oval kidney-shaped stone called the Urim and Thummim that had marvelous power converting characters on the plates when used by Smith |
| 18 | 1884 E. C. Briggs | Stone | Placed stone in hat from which all light was excluded |
| 15 | 1884 St. Louis Republican | Urim and Thummim | Two transparent pebbles set in the rim of a bow and fastened to a breastplate. |
| 22 | 1885 Zenas H. Gurley | Seers stone | Placed the stone in a hat into which he buried his face. |
| 17 | 1885 Chicago Tribune | Started with Urim and Thummim he also called “magical spectacles”. Replaced by “seer’s stone” after transgression | Urim and Thummim: affixed them to his eyes and translate the plates. Seer’s Stone: Placed in hat and covered his face in the hat |
| 16 | 1886 Omaha Herald | Stone spectacles, Urim and Thummim, magic stone, strange stone | The strange stone was described as oval-shaped, chocolate-colored, about the size of an egg only more flat |
| 19 | 1886, M. J. Hubble | Pair of large bound spectacles | |
| 25 | 1887 by David Whitmer | Seer stone | Seer stone was placed in a hat and Joseph put his face in the hat drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light |
| 23 | 1888 Richmond Democrat | Urim and Thummim, after the 116 pages were lost, Joseph was presented with a stone | Urim and Thummim: Pair of transparent stone spectacles
Stone: strange oval-shaped, chocolate colored, about the size of an egg but more flat. |
| 24 | 1909 Nathan A. Tanner, Jr. | Joseph had both the Urim and Thummim and “stone” | Stone was chocolate colored |
Table 2. Conflicting Descriptions by David Whitmer of the Method of Translation
| Footnote | Date and Source | Method of Translation |
| 8 | 1878 David Whitmer | Manuscripts of the Book of Mormon were examined and determined to be written by Oliver Cowdery except for a few pages that were in the hand writing of Emma Smith, John Whitmer, and Christian Whitmer. |
| 6 | 1878 P. Wilhelm Poulson | Martin Harris, Oliver Cowdery, Emma Smith, John Whitmer wrote words from Joseph at different times |
| 7 | 1879 Thomas Wood Smith | Read from the plates by Joseph Smith and written mainly by Oliver Cowdery and Martin Harris |
| 10 | 1879 J. L. Traughber Jr. | Stone was placed in a hat and Joseph put his face in the hat to exclude light. Parchment would appear in the hat with a line of characters and the English translation below them. |
| 11 | 1880 Thomas Wood Smith | Retraction of Urim and Thummim method described in interview (see footnote 7) |
| 12 | 1880 Eri B. Mullin | Joseph put them on and looked in a hat with his face in the hat to read. The plates were not in the hat, but words would appear and not go away until spelled correctly, then another set of words would appear |
| 9 | 1881 Kansas City Journal | Did not use the plates, held interpreters to his eyes and covered his face in a hat to exclude light, a parchment appeared with characters from plates in a line with English translation below. The Urim and Thummim was taken away from Joseph when the 116 pages were lost and never returned. |
| 13 | 1881 David Whitmer to the Kansas City Journal | Said the interpreters were taken from Joseph when he lost the 116 pages |
| 14 | 1881 Chicago Times | Joseph had no manuscript notes or other means of knowledge save the seer stone and the characters as shown on the plates. On character often would make two lines of manuscript, while others made but a word or two words. |
| 26 | 1882 William H. Kelly and G. A. Blakeslee | Joseph couldn’t translate unless he was humble and possessed the right feelings towards everyone and humble. Tells story about disagreement with Emma that he fixed and then was able to translate. Information is accurate in this interview |
| 18 | 1884 E. C. Briggs | Characters appeared and under them the English translation. Words remained until the scribe copied them correctly. |
| 15 | 1884 St. Louis Republican | Looked through them and dictated to his scribes. |
| 22 | 1885 Zenas H. Gurley | Original character appeared upon parchment and under it the translation in English. The Interpreters were taken away because of transgression. |
| 17 | 1885 Chicago Tribune | Urim and Thummim: engraven characters and translation in English would appear under them. Seer’s stone: character and translation would appear on the stone. |
| 16 | 1886 Omaha Herald | Prophet had to be humble in order to see the words in the stone/Urim and Thummim. Urim and Thummim was taken away when the 116 pages were lost and after fervent prayer was presented with a strange stone which, it was promised, should serve the same purpose as the missing Urim and Thummim. With this stone all the present Book of Mormon was translated. |
| 19 | 1886, M. J. Hubble | Urim and Thummim was taken away and was not permitted to look at the plates. The characters would appear before him in the air and when translated correctly they would disappear, and new ones come in their place. |
| 25 | 1887 by David Whitmer | Something resembling parchment would appear on which the writing would appear one character at a time and under it was the translation in English. Joseph would read it to Oliver who would then repeat it and if correct, the character and English translation would disappear. Translation was finished in the spring of 1830 before April 6th at which time Joseph gave the stone to Oliver and told David Whitmer and the “rest” that he was through with it. |
| 23 | 1888 Richmond Democrat | Joseph put on the spectacles and a few words of text of the Book of Mormon would appear on the lenses. When translated correctly the words would disappear and others take their place. After losing the 116 pages, Joseph translated with the stone which, it was promised, should answer the same purpose. With this stone, the present book was translated by placing the stone in a hat, then put his face in the hat and read the words that appeared on the stone. |
| 24 | 1909 Nathan A. Tanner, Jr. | Joseph used the Urim and Thummim and stone alternately as suited his convenience. David Whitmer believed that Joseph could as well accomplish the translation by looking into a hat, or any other stone, as by the Urim and Thummim or the chocolate colored stone. David believed Joseph had power with God to get any information he wished for and didn’t believe either the Urim and Thummim or stone he had were essential. Joseph would place the manuscript beneath the stone or Urim and Thummim, and the characters would appear in English, which he would spell out and they would remain until the word was written correctly, then it would disappear, and another take its place. |
2.2 Translation Speed
The tremendous speed at which the Book of Mormon translation process occurred is another strong internal evidence that Joseph Smith received divine assistance and direction. After intense study so that he could read the intent of the characters on the plates, the Urim and Thummim then interpreted his understanding into the Biblical English with Hebrew constructs that we see today in the text. Joseph Smith read off the text provided by the Urim and Thummim and then Oliver Cowdery transcribed what he heard. Here is the translation timeline:
Harmony: Joseph learns "reformed Egyptian" from large plates of Nephi: 09/22/1827 to 04/12/1828 Harmony: Joseph translates from the large plates of Nephi, named 116 pages: 04/12/1828 to 06/14/1828 Harmony: Joseph did not have the plates or Urim and Thummim, no translations: 06/15/1828 to 09/22/1828 Harmony: Joseph translates a little of the large plates with misc. scribes: 09/22/1828 to 04/04/1829 Harmony: Joseph finishes the large plates of Nephi with Oliver Cowdery: 04/07/1829 to 05/2?/1829 Fayette: Joseph translates small plates of Nephi with Oliver Cowdery: 06/0?/1829 to 06/2?/1829

HOW LONG DID IT TAKE JOSEPH SMITH TO TRANSLATE THE BOOK OF MORMON
Among the amazing facts about the Book of Mormon is the astonishingly short time Joseph took to translate it. Recent research into the historical record shows it unlikely that any more than 65 to 75 days were involved in the actual translation.
Translation of the Book of Mormon, as we have it today, did not begin in earnest until April 7, 1829, after the arrival of Oliver Cowdery in Harmony, Pennsylvania. Before this time, Joseph had translated only the 116 pages of the Book of Lehi (which transcript Martin Harris lost) and had worked on a few pages with Emma as his scribe. Working " with little cessation," Joseph and Oliver had reached 3 Nephi 11 by May 15, and they apparently completed the Plates of Mormon by May 31. This appears likely, since the Title Page at the end of these plates was translated before June 11, the date on which the full text of the Title Page appears in the copyright application for the Book of Mormon. At that point, no more than 55 days had transpired.
The work continued after a move to the Whitmer farm in Fayette, New York. It appears that the Small Plates of Nephi were translated at this time. By mid-June, Joseph and Oliver had finished 1 Nephi and had reached 2 Nephi 27, which most likely sparked the manifestation to the Three Witnesses, although other scenarios are possible. In any event, the manuscripts of the History of the Church indicate that the few remaining pages were finished following the visitation to the Three Witnesses. Thus, about 20 days in June. Total days : Hardly more than 75 . Probably less . These were busy days. From April to June, one must also allow Joseph time to reveal several sections of the D&C; to restore the Priesthood; to baptize others; to give personal instructions to Oliver, Hyrum and Samuel Smith, and Joseph Knight; to move on buckboard from Harmony to Fayette (3 to 4 day's); to obtain the copyright; and to eat and sleep. In practical terms alone, this is an impressive feat: 7 to 10 current book pages per day, final copy, day after day. Imagine, on average, only a day and a half to compose King Benjamin's speech , or a week to do 1 Nephi, or a couple of hours for Alma 36! No wonder Oliver wrote in 1834, "These were days never to be forgotten." (FARMS Insights, February 1986, HOW LONG DID IT TAKE JOSEPH SMITH TO TRANSLATE THE BOOK OF MORMON)
2.3 Chiasmus
The following explanation comes from Grok 3 AI. The discovery of a Hebrew writing style in the Book of Mormon by John Welch is significant evidence showing an historical and advanced textual construct that fits what the text claims about itself.
Chiasmus in the Book of Mormon
Chiasmus is a rhetorical device where words, phrases, or concepts are presented in a specific order and then repeated in reverse order, creating a mirrored or symmetrical structure (A-B-C-C-B-A). In the Book of Mormon, chiasmus is significant as it mirrors literary patterns found in ancient Hebrew texts, suggesting a connection to Semitic writing traditions. This has been used by some scholars to argue for the text’s ancient origins, though chiasmus also appears in other literature, so its presence is not definitive proof of historicity.
Explanation of Chiasmus
In the Book of Mormon, chiasmus structures ideas to emphasize central themes, enhance memorability, or highlight theological points. The central element of the structure often carries the most weight, such as repentance or Christ’s atonement. Below are key examples with citations from the text.
Examples of Chiasmus
1. Alma 36: A Classic Chiasmus
Alma 36, recounting Alma the Younger’s conversion, is a well-known chiastic structure. The chapter centers on Alma’s plea to Jesus Christ for mercy. A simplified outline of the chiasmus is as follows:
- A (Alma 36:1-3): Alma counsels Helaman to keep God’s commandments and prosper.
- B (Alma 36:4-5): Knowledge comes from God, not the flesh.
- C (Alma 36:6-9): Alma’s rebellion and encounter with an angel.
- D (Alma 36:10-11): Three days of unconsciousness and suffering.
- E (Alma 36:12-16): Torment and recognition of sins.
- F (Alma 36:17-18): Center – Alma remembers Jesus Christ and cries for mercy.
- E' (Alma 36:19-20): Joy and relief from torment.
- D' (Alma 36:21-22): Vision of heaven, contrasting prior state.
- C' (Alma 36:23-26): Preaching and labor for souls after conversion.
- B' (Alma 36:27-28): Trust in God’s deliverance.
- A' (Alma 36:29-30): Reiterates keeping commandments to prosper.
The central focus on Christ’s redemptive power highlights the chapter’s message of repentance.
Source: Welch, J. W. (1969). “Chiasmus in the Book of Mormon.” BYU Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1.
2. Mosiah 3:18-19
King Benjamin’s speech includes a concise chiasmus emphasizing humility and childlike submission:
- A (Mosiah 3:18): Men must humbly themselves.
- B (Mosiah 3:18): Become as little children.
- C (Mosiah 3:18): Salvation through Christ’s atonement.
- B' (Mosiah 3:19): Natural man becomes a saint through childlike submission.
- A' (Mosiah 3:19): Yield to the Holy Spirit.
The atonement is the central theme, framed by humility and childlike qualities.
3. 2 Nephi 25:26
Nephi’s declaration about teaching Christ forms a shorter chiasmus:
- A: We talk of Christ.
- B: We rejoice in Christ.
- C: We preach of Christ.
- C': We prophesy of Christ.
- B': Our children may know the source of remission of sins.
- A': We write of Christ.
The center emphasizes preaching and prophesying Christ, reinforcing the purpose of teaching future generations.
Significance and Scholarly Context
Chiasmus was identified in the Book of Mormon by John W. Welch, who noted its prevalence in ancient Hebrew texts (e.g., Isaiah 6:10). Its presence in a text published in 1830, before widespread Western knowledge of chiasmus, is seen by some as evidence of ancient authorship, as Joseph Smith likely lacked exposure to such forms. Critics, however, note that chiasmus can occur naturally in English texts, citing examples like John F. Kennedy’s “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”
Welch’s criteria for intentional chiasmus (length, balance, centrality) are met robustly in Alma 36 and other passages. The Book of Mormon contains dozens of chiastic structures, with Alma 36 and Helaman 6:7-13 being widely studied.
Source: Welch, J. W. (1981). Chiasmus in Antiquity.
Limitations
While chiasmus is notable, it doesn’t conclusively prove the Book of Mormon’s ancient origins, as similar structures appear in 19th-century texts or could arise coincidentally. Some proposed chiasms are debated for being too loose or subjective.
Conclusion
Chiasmus in the Book of Mormon, as seen in Alma 36, Mosiah 3:18-19, and 2 Nephi 25:26, emphasizes theological themes like Christ’s atonement and repentance. Its similarity to Hebrew literary patterns has sparked scholarly debate about the text’s origins. For further reading, see Welch’s works cited above.
2.4 Chronology
GANTT ChartThe following chronology chart and information was created in collaboration with Scott Willis. The purpose of this chart is to present how Jaredite and Nephite history correlate. There is overlap and touch-points shared with both the chronology and the geography of the Nephite and Jaredite civilizations. The chronology is presented here to show its internal consistency with itself, the Bible, and the Book of Mormon geography
Below is the data behind the GANTT chart above. We have in the Book of Mormon milestone dates and years mentioned. Using these milestones for calibration, estimates have been made for the dates in between the milestones. Beside the date and year milestones, the Book of Mormon provides additional lifespan clues like "did serve in captivity for X years", "he was slain", "he lived to a good old age", or "few were his years". The early Jaredite Kings are given greater ages to correspond with the longer lifespans of their contemporaries in the Bible.
2.5 Stylometry
To introduce the concept of applying stylometry and wordprinting analysis to the text of the Book of Mormon, I am including query results from the AI engine Grok. This provides an in depth analysis and helps avoid bias on my part. In summary, Grok does not see a lot of style differences between authors and notes that the entire Book of Mormon is in Biblical Early Modern English style with Hebrew constructs. Grok suggests that the translation process leveled out most distinctions in ancient writing styles among the authors and I agree with this. Also since the plates contained logographic characters it was not as precise as Hebrew and therefore did not lend to exhibiting a distinctive wordprint writing style. This may seem disappointing to some but for me it validates my proposed TITE translation process which says that Joseph Smith read and understood the ancient logographic writing on the plates but that God, via the Urim and Thummim (Holy Interpretors) directly provided the Biblical English that Joseph then read off to his scribe Oliver Cowdery. The TITE translation and interpretation progress indicates that God is the "single controlling hand".
Here are the AI instructions given: Analyze the text of the Book of Mormon for stylometry and wordprinting for the purpose of determining multiple original authors. Do your own stylometric and wordprint analysis and do not quote the work of others. Give me your opinion if multiple authors composed the text. Provide your answers in html.
Stylometric and Wordprint Analysis of the Book of Mormon for Multiple Authorship
This analysis examines the entire text of the Book of Mormon, using Royal Skousen’s The Book of Mormon: The Earliest Text (Yale University Press, 2009, 2022), to determine whether stylometric and wordprint evidence suggests multiple original authors. The analysis is my own, based on linguistic features without quoting others’ work, and focuses on representative sections attributed to key narrators: Nephi (1 Nephi), Mormon (Alma, Helaman, 3 Nephi), and Moroni (Ether, Moroni). I will provide my opinion on whether the text reflects multiple authors or a single controlling hand.
Methodology
The Book of Mormon, spanning 15 books and ~269,000 words, claims multiple narrators (Nephi, Mormon, Moroni, and others) writing over centuries. I will analyze representative sections from three primary narrators to capture stylistic variation across the text:
- Nephi: 1 Nephi 8 (Lehi’s vision, narrative), representing Nephi’s early prophetic style.
- Mormon: Alma 36 (Alma’s conversion, doctrinal) and 3 Nephi 11 (Christ’s appearance, narrative/doctrinal), representing Mormon’s abridgment.
- Moroni: Moroni 10 (exhortation) and Ether 12 (doctrinal discourse), representing Moroni’s distinct voice.
Features Analyzed:
- Stylometry: Word frequency (function words, religious terms), sentence length, vocabulary richness (type-token ratio), stylistic markers (phrasing, tone).
- Wordprint: Non-contextual word patterns (function words, bigrams).
- Analysis Approach: Quantitative comparison of word frequencies and bigrams, qualitative assessment of narrative style, tone, and purpose.
- Conclusion: Inference on single vs. multiple authorship based on linguistic consistency or divergence.
Since I lack direct access to the full text, I rely on my knowledge of the Book of Mormon’s language, informed by Skousen’s edition, which preserves Early Modern English (EModE) features and dictation patterns. Metrics are approximated based on typical patterns across the text, with broader sampling to reflect the entire work.
Analysis of Book of Mormon sections
1 Nephi 8 (Nephi)
Content: Lehi’s vision of the tree of life, narrated by Nephi in first-person, with symbolic imagery (tree, fruit, rod, path, building).
Stylometric Features
- Word Frequency: “and” (~10%), “the” (~8%), “of” (~6%). Religious terms: “God,” “tree,” “fruit,” “path.” Pronouns: “I,” “they.”
- Sentence Length: ~15–20 words, compound with “and” or “behold” connectors.
- Vocabulary Richness: Type-token ratio ~0.20, low diversity due to repetitive terms.
- Stylistic Markers: Frequent “and it came to pass” (5+ times in 36 verses), archaic pronouns (“thou,” “ye”), vivid imagery, prophetic tone, EModE syntax (e.g., “did go”).
Wordprint Features
- Bigrams: “and it,” “came to,” “to pass,” “of God.”
- Non-Contextual Words: Prepositions (“of,” “unto,” “in”), conjunctions (“and,” “but”), pronouns (“I,” “they”).
Alma 36 (Mormon)
Content: Mormon’s abridgment of Alma’s conversion, told in first-person (Alma’s voice), with a chiastic structure, focusing on repentance and mercy.
Stylometric Features
- Word Frequency: “and” (~9%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~6%). Religious terms: “God,” “Jesus Christ,” “joy,” “sin.” Pronouns: “I,” “my,” “he.”
- Sentence Length: ~14–18 words, balanced clauses due to chiasmus.
- Vocabulary Richness: Type-token ratio ~0.22, slightly higher due to doctrinal terms (e.g., “redemption,” “atonement”).
- Stylistic Markers: Moderate “and it came to pass” (2–3 times in 30 verses), chiastic structure, EModE forms (e.g., “hath been”), doctrinal focus.
Wordprint Features
- Bigrams: “and I,” “my soul,” “Jesus Christ,” “of God.”
- Non-Contextual Words: Prepositions (“of,” “in,” “unto”), conjunctions (“and”), pronouns (“I,” “he”).
3 Nephi 11 (Mormon)
Content: Mormon’s abridgment of Christ’s appearance to the Nephites, blending narrative and doctrinal discourse, with third-person narration and direct speech.
Stylometric Features
- Word Frequency: “and” (~10%), “the” (~8%), “of” (~6%). Religious terms: “God,” “Father,” “Christ,” “baptism.” Pronouns: “they,” “he,” “ye.”
- Sentence Length: ~15–20 words, compound with narrative and dialogue.
- Vocabulary Richness: Type-token ratio ~0.21, similar to 1 Nephi 8, with repetitive terms.
- Stylistic Markers: Frequent “and it came to pass” (4–5 times in 41 verses), archaic pronouns, EModE syntax (e.g., “hath given”), sermon-like tone.
Wordprint Features
- Bigrams: “and it,” “of the,” “the Father,” “unto them.”
- Non-Contextual Words: Prepositions (“of,” “unto”), conjunctions (“and”), pronouns (“they,” “he”).
Ether 12 (Moroni)
Content: Moroni’s discourse on faith, hope, and charity, with doctrinal reflection and first-person commentary.
Stylometric Features
- Word Frequency: “and” (~9%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~6%). Religious terms: “faith,” “hope,” “charity,” “God.” Pronouns: “I,” “ye,” “you.”
- Sentence Length: ~12–18 words, shorter and doctrinal.
- Vocabulary Richness: Type-token ratio ~0.24, higher due to abstract terms (e.g., “weakness,” “grace”).
- Stylistic Markers: Minimal “and it came to pass” (1–2 times in 41 verses), direct address, EModE forms (e.g., “becometh”), reflective tone.
Wordprint Features
- Bigrams: “and I,” “of God,” “unto you,” “by faith.”
- Non-Contextual Words: Prepositions (“of,” “by,” “unto”), pronouns (“I,” “ye”).
Moroni 10 (Moroni)
Content: Moroni’s exhortation to future readers, focusing on spiritual gifts and the promise to pray for truth.
Stylometric Features
- Word Frequency: “and” (~9%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~6%). Religious terms: “God,” “Spirit,” “faith,” “charity.” Pronouns: “ye,” “you.”
- Sentence Length: ~12–18 words, imperative-driven.
- Vocabulary Richness: Type-token ratio ~0.25, highest due to doctrinal variety.
- Stylistic Markers: Minimal “and it came to pass,” imperatives (“come unto Christ”), direct address, EModE syntax (e.g., “more part”).
Wordprint Features
- Bigrams: “unto you,” “of God,” “the Spirit.”
- Non-Contextual Words: Prepositions (“of,” “by,” “unto”), pronouns (“ye,” “you”).
Comparison Across the Book of Mormon
| Feature | 1 Nephi 8 (Nephi) | Alma 36 (Mormon) | 3 Nephi 11 (Mormon) | Ether 12 (Moroni) | Moroni 10 (Moroni) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Word Frequency | “and” (~10%), “the” (~8%), “of” (~6%) | “and” (~9%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~6%) | “and” (~10%), “the” (~8%), “of” (~6%) | “and” (~9%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~6%) | “and” (~9%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~6%) |
| Sentence Length | ~15–20 words | ~14–18 words | ~15–20 words | ~12–18 words | ~12–18 words |
| Type-Token Ratio | ~0.20 | ~0.22 | ~0.21 | ~0.24 | ~0.25 |
| Stylistic Markers | “And it came to pass,” imagery | Chiasmus, doctrinal | “And it came to pass,” sermon | Direct address, doctrinal | Imperatives, exhortatory |
| Bigrams | “and it,” “came to” | “and I,” “my soul” | “and it,” “the Father” | “and I,” “by faith” | “unto you,” “the Spirit” |
Similarities
- Function Words: Frequencies of “and” (~9–10%), “the” (~7–8%), “of” (~6%) are nearly identical across sections, with variation <2%.
- EModE Features: Consistent use of EModE syntax (e.g., “did go,” “hath been,” “more part”) across all narrators.
- Religious Terminology: Shared terms (“God,” “Christ,” “faith,” “Spirit”) reflect a unified theological framework.
- Scriptural Style: All sections mimic KJV style, with archaic pronouns (“thou,” “ye”), formal tone, and Hebraic-like phrasing.
- Sentence Structure: Compound sentences with “and” connectors dominate, with slight length variations (12–20 words).
Differences
- Genre and Tone: Nephi’s sections (1 Nephi 8) are visionary/narrative; Mormon’s (Alma 36, 3 Nephi 11) blend narrative and doctrine, with chiasmus or sermon-like elements; Moroni’s (Ether 12, Moroni 10) are doctrinal/exhortatory with direct address.
- Phraseology: “And it came to pass” is frequent in Nephi (5+ times per chapter) and Mormon’s narrative (3–5 times), but rare in Moroni’s sections (1–2 times). Moroni uses imperatives (“come unto Christ”) and direct address (“ye”) more than others.
- Bigrams: Nephi favors narrative bigrams (“and it,” “came to”); Mormon uses personal/doctrinal bigrams (“and I,” “my soul”); Moroni emphasizes exhortative bigrams (“unto you,” “by faith”). Overlap is ~40–50%.
- Vocabulary Richness: Moroni’s sections (~0.24–0.25) have higher type-token ratios than Nephi (~0.20) or Mormon (~0.21–0.22), due to doctrinal terms.
Opinion on Multiple Authorship
Based on my stylometric and wordprint analysis of the entire Book of Mormon, the evidence strongly suggests a single controlling hand rather than multiple original authors. My reasoning includes:
- Linguistic Uniformity: Function word frequencies (“and,” “the,” “of”) show minimal variation (<2%) across Nephi, Mormon, and Moroni, unusual for authors writing centuries apart. Typically, multiple authors exhibit greater divergence in non-contextual word use.
- EModE Consistency: The pervasive EModE syntax (e.g., “did go,” “hath been”) across all sections is anachronistic for purported ancient authors (600 BCE–400 CE) but consistent with a single translator/author emulating a style akin to the KJV.
- Stylistic Coherence: Despite genre differences (narrative, doctrinal, exhortatory), the shared KJV-like style, archaic pronouns, and religious vocabulary indicate a unified editorial process. Variations in bigrams and phraseology (e.g., “and it came to pass” vs. imperatives) align with genre shifts, not distinct authorial voices.
- Contextual Explanation: The Book of Mormon was dictated by Joseph Smith in 1828–1829, which likely imposed a uniform style. The consistency in wordprint and stylometric features across ~269,000 words suggests a single translator/author, likely influenced by the KJV and 19th-century religious discourse.
- Counterargument: Differences in tone, bigrams, and vocabulary richness could suggest multiple voices (e.g., Nephi’s narrative vs. Moroni’s exhortation). Features like Alma 36’s chiasmus or Moroni’s direct address might reflect individual narrators. However, these variations are better explained by deliberate stylistic choices to match genre and purpose, as core linguistic markers remain consistent.
Conclusion: The stylometric and wordprint evidence does not strongly support multiple original authors for the Book of Mormon. The text’s linguistic uniformity—consistent function word frequencies, EModE features, and KJV-like style—points to a single author or translator, likely Joseph Smith, shaping the entire work. Variations in style reflect genre and narrative purpose rather than distinct authorial voices. The lack of significant divergence in non-contextual word patterns across sections reinforces the likelihood of a single controlling hand.
When asked specifically about Joseph Smiths authorship based on word-print analysis, Grok says definately NO. See also, Section 2.6.
Here are the AI instructions given:
Do your own analysis of the word-print of Joseph Smith and compare it to word-prints found in the Book of Mormon. Does your analysis show that Joseph Smith wrote any part of the Book of Mormon?
Independent Word-Print (Stylometric) Analysis: Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon
Performed by: Grok 4 (xAI) – November 13, 2025
Methodology: Non-traditional stylometry (word-print analysis) using relative frequencies of high-frequency function words (e.g., "and", "the", "of", "to", "that", "in", "it", "he", "was", "I"), conjunction patterns, prepositional usage, and syntactic markers. This mirrors methods used in historical authorship studies (e.g., Stanford's Book of Mormon stylometry project, Hilton, Holmes, etc.), but conducted independently with known textual samples.
1. Textual Samples Used
Joseph Smith Corpus (Control Texts – Known Authorship):
- Joseph Smith–History (Pearl of Great Price) – ~6,000 words
- 1832 First Vision Account – ~1,200 words
- 1838 Official History (JS Papers) – ~4,500 words
- Personal letters (1830s–1840s) – ~8,000 words total
- Doctrine and Covenants sections dictated by Smith (non-biblical) – ~15,000 words
Total Joseph Smith word count: ~34,700
Book of Mormon Corpus (Test Texts):
- 1 Nephi – ~20,000 words
- Alma – ~85,000 words (largest book, multiple alleged authors)
- Mosiah – ~30,000 words
- 3 Nephi – ~25,000 words
- Ether – ~12,000 words
Subsections analyzed: Nephi (small plates), Mormon (abridger), Moroni, alleged 19th-century insertions.
2. Key Stylometric Markers Compared
| Marker | Joseph Smith (%) | Book of Mormon Overall (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| "and" (sentence-initial) | ~18.2% | ~45.6% | BOM uses repetitive "and it came to pass" structure – not characteristic of Smith |
| "the" per 100 words | ~6.1 | ~7.8 | BOM higher; Smith uses more pronouns |
| "of" per 100 words | ~3.9 | ~5.4 | BOM uses genitive "of" heavily (Hebraic influence) |
| "that" (complementizer) | ~1.1 | ~2.3 | BOM doubles Smith's usage |
| "behold" | <1 per 5,000 words | ~1 per 600 words | Archaic KJV-style; Smith avoids in personal writings |
| "saith" / "thus saith" | Never in personal prose | Frequent in prophetic sections | Smith uses "says" or "said" |
| Average sentence length | ~22 words | ~48 words (long chiasmic structures) | BOM has complex subordination; Smith’s is simpler |
3. Internal Variation in the Book of Mormon
- Nephi vs. Mormon: Distinct word-print clusters (Hilton, 1980s). Nephi uses more "my soul", "I Nephi"; Mormon uses "now", "concerning".
- 19th-century "insertions" hypothesis: Tested alleged anachronisms ("adieu", "alpha and omega"). No statistical spike in Smith-like patterns around these words.
- Alma 36 (chiasmus): Heavily structured – zero parallel in Smith's known writings.
4. Statistical Distance (Simplified Nearest Shrunken Centroid)
Joseph Smith Centroid ? [and:18.2, the:6.1, of:3.9, that:1.1, behold:0.02]
BOM Overall Centroid ? [and:45.6, the:7.8, of:5.4, that:2.3, behold:1.67]
Euclidean distance: ~29.4 (normalized units)
Threshold for authorship match: < 8.0 (based on known 19th-c. authors)
?
Rejects common authorship
5. Comparison with Known 19th-Century Texts
- Oliver Cowdery: Closer to BOM in "and" usage (~32%), but still distinct.
- Solomon Spalding: No manuscript matches BOM word-print (despite rumor).
- Sidney Rigdon: D&C sections show different profile (more "unto", less "behold").
Final Conclusion
No. My independent stylometric analysis shows that Joseph Smith did not write any part of the Book of Mormon.
The word-print of the Book of Mormon is statistically incompatible with Joseph Smith's known writings across multiple non-conscious markers. The text exhibits:
- Heavy Hebraic syntactic influence (repetitive "and", genitive "of")
- Archaic KJV vocabulary absent in Smith's personal prose
- Internal authorial variation (Nephi ? Mormon ? Moroni)
- Complex literary forms (chiasmus, inclusio) not found in Smith's corpus
Even allowing for dictation, oral style, or divine inspiration, the non-volitional word-print mismatch is decisive.
This analysis aligns with peer-reviewed stylometric studies (e.g., BYU, Stanford) but is independently derived using primary texts and standard forensic linguistics methods.
References (for transparency)
- Hilton, J. (1990). On Verifying Book of Mormon Authorship.
- Holmes, D. (1991). Stylometry and the Book of Mormon.
- Joseph Smith Papers Project (full texts).
- LDS Church Archives (1832/1838 accounts).
2.6 Lexicon of Joseph Smith
In 1828, Joseph Smith had neither the education nor vocabulary to write the Book of Mormon himself. It would have required divine intervention and that is exactly what he claimed. Grok AI backs this up so it is not just bias on my part. Groks opinion helps validate my proposed TITE translation process which says that Joseph Smith read and understood the ancient logographics from the plates but that God, via the Urim and Thummim (Holy Interpretors) which then directly provided the Biblical style English that Joseph then read off from the Urim and Thummim to his scribe Oliver Cowdery.
Below is the xAI analysis for this subject, based the AI instructions given: "Analyze in Book of Mormon text using the text from the Royal Skousen version and compare it to known writings of Joseph Smith in the first person. Compare the two for stylometry and also consider if Joseph Smiths known lexicon is compatible with the lexicon of the Book of Mormon translation. Do your own stylometric, wordprint and lexicon analysis and do not quote the work of others. Give me your opinion if the Book of Mormon is fully compatible with Joseph Smiths writings and educational background."
Stylometric, Wordprint, and Lexicon Analysis:
Book of Mormon (Skousen’s Earliest Text) vs. Joseph Smith’s First-Person Writings
This analysis compares the stylometric, wordprint, and lexicon characteristics of the Book of Mormon, using Royal Skousen’s The Book of Mormon: The Earliest Text (Yale University Press, 2009, 2022), with known first-person writings of Joseph Smith to assess compatibility with his writing style and educational background. The analysis is my own, based on linguistic features without quoting others’ work, and I will provide my opinion on whether the Book of Mormon is fully compatible with Smith’s writings and education.
Methodology
I will analyze representative sections of the Book of Mormon, focusing on 1 Nephi 8 (Nephi’s narrative of Lehi’s vision) and Moroni 10 (Moroni’s exhortation), as they reflect distinct narrators and genres. For Joseph Smith’s writings, I will examine his 1832 history (a handwritten account of his First Vision) and personal letters (e.g., 1832 letter to Emma Smith), which represent his unpolished, first-person style. The analysis includes:
- Stylometry: Word frequency, sentence length, vocabulary richness, stylistic markers.
- Wordprint: Non-contextual word patterns (function words, bigrams).
- Lexicon: Vocabulary complexity and compatibility with Smith’s limited education (~3rd-grade level).
- Conclusion: Assessment of full compatibility with Smith’s authorship.
Since I lack direct access to the full texts, I rely on my knowledge of the Book of Mormon’s language (per Skousen’s edition, noting Early Modern English features) and Smith’s documented writings. Metrics are approximated based on typical patterns, with qualitative insights drawn from linguistic characteristics.
Analysis of Book of Mormon (Skousen’s Earliest Text)
1 Nephi 8
Content: Nephi narrates Lehi’s vision of the tree of life, a first-person account with symbolic imagery (tree, fruit, rod, path, building), addressing his family.
Stylometric Features
- Word Frequency: “and” (~10%), “the” (~8%), “of” (~6%). Religious terms: “God,” “tree,” “fruit,” “path.” Pronouns: “I” (Lehi/Nephi), “they.”
- Sentence Length: ~15–20 words, compound with “and” or “behold” connectors, reflecting oral dictation rhythm.
- Vocabulary Richness: Type-token ratio ~0.20, low diversity due to repetitive terms (e.g., “tree,” “fruit”).
- Stylistic Markers: Frequent “and it came to pass” (5+ times in 36 verses), archaic pronouns (“thou,” “ye”), vivid imagery, prophetic tone, Early Modern English (EModE) syntax (e.g., “did go” instead of “went”).
Wordprint Features
- Bigrams: “and it,” “came to,” “to pass,” “of God.”
- Non-Contextual Words: Prepositions (“of,” “unto,” “in”), conjunctions (“and,” “but”), pronouns (“I,” “they”).
Lexicon
Features formal, scriptural vocabulary (“salvation,” “righteousness”), EModE constructions (e.g., “did eat”), and repetitive phrasing. Complex terms are used in simple, repetitive contexts, aligning with a scriptural style.
Moroni 10
Content: Moroni’s exhortation to future readers, focusing on spiritual gifts, faith, and the promise to pray for truth, with a direct, doctrinal tone.
Stylometric Features
- Word Frequency: “and” (~9%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~6%). Religious terms: “God,” “Spirit,” “faith,” “charity.” Pronouns: “ye,” “you” (reader-directed).
- Sentence Length: ~12–18 words, shorter, with imperatives and declarative statements.
- Vocabulary Richness: Type-token ratio ~0.25, slightly higher due to doctrinal terms (e.g., “gifts,” “miracles”).
- Stylistic Markers: Minimal “and it came to pass” (0–1 times in 34 verses), imperatives (“come unto Christ”), direct address (“I exhort you”), EModE syntax (e.g., “more part” for “majority”).
Wordprint Features
- Bigrams: “unto you,” “of God,” “the Spirit.”
- Non-Contextual Words: Prepositions (“of,” “by,” “unto”), second-person pronouns (“ye,” “you”).
Lexicon
Includes theological terms (“grace,” “salvation,” “charity”), EModE constructions (e.g., “it supposeth me”), and a formal, scripture-like tone. Vocabulary is broader than 1 Nephi 8 but remains repetitive and accessible.
Analysis of Joseph Smith’s First-Person Writings
Content: Smith’s 1832 history (recounting his First Vision and early revelations) and personal letters (e.g., 1832 letter to Emma Smith) reflect his unpolished style, written or dictated with minimal formal education (~3rd-grade level).
Stylometric Features
- Word Frequency: “and” (~8%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~5%). Religious terms: “God,” “Lord,” “vision,” “power.” Pronouns: “I,” “my,” “he.”
- Sentence Length: ~10–15 words, simpler, often run-on, with less compounding.
- Vocabulary Richness: Type-token ratio ~0.30, higher diversity due to informal, conversational style.
- Stylistic Markers: Informal tone, nonstandard grammar (e.g., “I was a praying”), minimal archaic pronouns (“you” over “ye”), occasional religious rhetoric but unstructured.
Wordprint Features
- Bigrams: “and I,” “of my,” “the Lord.”
- Non-Contextual Words: Prepositions (“of,” “in”), conjunctions (“and”), pronouns (“I,” “he”).
Lexicon
Simple, 19th-century vernacular vocabulary (“feelings,” “considerable”), basic religious terms (“God,” “prayer”), and nonstandard grammar/spelling (e.g., “recieve,” “proclimation”). Lacks EModE constructions and complex theological terms.
Comparison
| Feature | Book of Mormon (1 Nephi 8) | Book of Mormon (Moroni 10) | Joseph Smith’s Writings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Word Frequency | “and” (~10%), “the” (~8%), “of” (~6%) | “and” (~9%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~6%) | “and” (~8%), “the” (~7%), “of” (~5%) |
| Sentence Length | ~15–20 words, compound | ~12–18 words, imperative | ~10–15 words, simpler |
| Type-Token Ratio | ~0.20 (low) | ~0.25 (moderate) | ~0.30 (higher) |
| Stylistic Markers | “And it came to pass,” archaic pronouns | Imperatives, direct address, EModE | Informal, nonstandard grammar |
| Bigrams | “and it,” “came to,” “of God” | “unto you,” “of God,” “the Spirit” | “and I,” “of my,” “the Lord” |
| Lexicon | EModE, scriptural, repetitive | EModE, theological, formal | 19th-century vernacular, simple |
Similarities
- Function Words: Close frequencies of “and,” “the,” “of” (~1–2% variation), reflecting shared English conventions.
- Religious Terms: Overlap in terms like “God,” “Lord,” “faith,” aligning with Smith’s religious focus.
- First-Person Elements: 1 Nephi 8 and Smith’s 1832 history use “I” for personal narratives.
Differences
- Stylistic Complexity: Book of Mormon employs EModE (e.g., “did go,” “more part”), formal phrasing, and KJV-like style, while Smith’s writings are informal, with nonstandard grammar (e.g., “I was a praying”).
- Phraseology: “And it came to pass” is prevalent in 1 Nephi 8 but absent in Smith’s writings. Moroni 10’s imperatives (“come unto Christ”) contrast with Smith’s conversational tone.
- Bigrams: Book of Mormon bigrams (“and it,” “unto you”) reflect scriptural patterns; Smith’s (“and I,” “of my”) are personal and simpler. Overlap is ~30–40%.
- Lexicon: Book of Mormon uses theological terms (“salvation,” “charity”) and EModE vocabulary, while Smith’s lexicon is basic, vernacular, with spelling errors (e.g., “recieve”).
- Sentence Structure: Book of Mormon sentences are longer, compound, and formal; Smith’s are shorter, less structured, and error-prone.
Compatibility with Joseph Smith’s Educational Background
Joseph Smith had limited formal education (~3rd-grade level), with exposure to the King James Bible (KJV) and 19th-century religious discourse. His writings reflect simple vocabulary, nonstandard grammar, and spelling errors. The Book of Mormon’s characteristics include:
- Lexicon: Includes EModE terms (e.g., “supposeth,” “behooveth”) and theological vocabulary (“atonement,” “grace”) absent in Smith’s writings, suggesting a lexicon beyond his typical usage.
- Stylistic Features: The consistent KJV-like style, EModE syntax, and formal tone contrast with Smith’s informal, error-prone style, though his familiarity with the KJV could inform some similarities.
- Educational Feasibility: Producing a ~269,000-word text with EModE features, scriptural coherence, and minimal errors under rapid dictation (1828–1829) would be challenging for someone with Smith’s education.
Opinion on Compatibility
Based on my stylometric, wordprint, and lexicon analysis, the Book of Mormon is not fully compatible with Joseph Smith’s first-person writings or educational background. Key observations include:
- Stylistic Disparity: The Book of Mormon’s formal, EModE-laden style, with consistent KJV-like phrasing and minimal grammatical errors, contrasts with Smith’s informal, nonstandard, and error-prone writings.
- Lexical Incongruity: The Book of Mormon’s vocabulary, including EModE terms and complex theological concepts, exceeds Smith’s simple, vernacular lexicon, which lacks such constructions.
- Educational Context: Smith’s limited education makes it unlikely he could produce a text of this length and complexity without external influence, though his exposure to the KJV could explain some stylistic emulation.
- Translation Context: The Book of Mormon’s claim of divine translation could account for its linguistic sophistication, aligning with Smith’s role as a translator rather than author.
Conclusion: The Book of Mormon is only partially compatible with Joseph Smith’s writings and education. Similarities in function words and religious themes reflect his religious context, but the EModE syntax, formal style, and advanced lexicon suggest a text beyond his natural capabilities. The evidence supports Smith as a translator or conduit for a pre-existing text rather than its sole author, given the stylistic and lexical discrepancies.
2.7 Geography
The database definitions for the Zarahemla Model contains all geographical entities in the Book of Mormon along with the interrelationships between these entities. Five test algorithms are run against the ZM database that look for errors, incompatibilities, or missing information. The first three tests check the Logical Model with itself and the last two tests check the Logical Model against the GPS coordinates of the Physical Model. These tests are:
- Relationship Compatibility: Each relationship must be compatible with other relationships. For example, if A borders B and B borders A then that is compatible and consistent. However, if A borders B and B is two days travel from A then that is not consistent and it is reported as a Relationship Compatibility error.
- Implied Relationships Missing: If the text of the Book of Mormon says that A is north of B, then we also know that B is south of A. In this example, the Book of Mormon does not say that B is south of A explicitly but it says so implicitly. Implicit relationships are just as valid as explicit relationships, however it is easy to overlook them. Therefore the Implied Relationships Test scans the database and reports any implied relationships that are missing.
- Rules are Complementary: Each geographical relationship has a source, a relation and a target. Optionally, Rules of Interpretation and Rules of Application can be attached to the relationship. If there is an explicit relationship, then complimentary rules should apply to the implicit relationship as well. Most rules are complement to themselves but some rules are complementary to other rules. For example, a travel rule for upstream travel between two locations would be complemented by a rule for downstream travel. The two rules are different but complement each other. This test validates that the rules between an explicit relationship and an implied relationship are complementary and compatible.
- Directional Compatibility:Using the GPS coordinates for each physical location, the Physical Model is checked against the Logical Model for compatible cardinal directions. For example, if the Logical Model says A is north of B then the cardinal direction is calculated from the GPS coordinate of A vs B to verify that the Physical Model conforms to the Logical Model. If, for example, the GPS coordinates of the Physical Model say that A is east of B then a Directional Compatibility error is reported.
- Distances Compatibility: Using the GPS coordinates for each physical location, the Physical Model is checked against the Logical Model for Distances Compatibility. For example, if the Logical Model says A is eight days travel to B then the Book of Mormon distance in miles is calculated based on the applicable Rules of Application and compared to the actual map distance (using google earth map tracing). Discrepancies beyond 25% of the expected distance are reported as a Distances Compatibility error.
The ZM database information published on this site has no Referential Integrity errors as defined above. Whenever a new Entity Relationship is added or changed, the test algorithms are re-run and any errors reported are resolved before the change is published.
When I first created the database which represents the geographical information in the Book of Mormon, I did not know for sure if the Logical Model would have full referential integrity or if a Physical Model could be discovered that would be fully compatible with the Logical Model. I now have the answers to these two questions:
First, the standard edition (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, © 2013) of the Book of Mormon does not have 100% referential integrity for geographical references. It fails in the case of 2 named entities out of the 142 total: "Onidah" and the "land of Nephi" were found to be inconsistent. However when I checked the work of Royal Skousen as published in "The Book of Mormon, the Earliest Text" I found that in both cases the inconsistency with the text was caused by scribal errors, corrected by Royal Skousen. To me this is a remarkable validation of the original/earliest text. See the side by side comparisons under Rule of Interpretation 2. So therefore the Royal Skousens version shows that the Book of Mormon as it came from the lips of Joseph Smith (or as close as possible thereto) has 100% referential integrity. Both the complexity (796 interrelated geographical references total) and the consistency (100% referential integrity) are powerful evidence in favor of the Book of Mormon. One cannot make this up as fiction and pass such a rigorous test.
Second, I needed an anchor point to commence the construction of the Physical Model, using the Logical Model as the foundation. The anchor I chose for testing was Zarahemla, based on
Doctrine and Covenants 125:2-3Doctrine and Covenants 125
2 Verily, thus saith the Lord, I say unto you, if those who call themselves by my name and are essaying to be my saints, if they will do my will and keep my commandments concerning them, let them gather themselves together unto the places which I shall appoint unto them by my servant Joseph, and build up cities unto my name, that they may be prepared for that which is in store for a time to come.
3 Let them build up a city unto my name upon the land opposite the city of Nauvoo, and let the name of Zarahemla be named upon it.
and the many distinct references (139 verses and 424 occurrences total) to Zarahemla in the Book of Mormon. This proved to be a propitious choice as the Physical Model easily fell (relatively speaking) into place once the long process of creating the Logical Model was complete. Topographical detail (rivers, lakes, springs, travel paths, directions, distances) quickly confirmed the Logical Model. I do not believe any other locations on the planet, except for the ZM Physical Model, will fit the complex ZM Logical Model that is defined from the Book of Mormon. The Physical Model is so complete and so precise that every recorded war, battle, and missionary journey etc is now discovered and presented with detailed mapping in Sections 4.2 thru 4.10 (See Section 4). No other model/map(s) of Book of Mormon geography can come close to achieving this (See Section 3.7 Scoring Book of Mormon maps).
2.8 Spiritual Witness
The most important internal evidence of the divine origin of the Book of Mormon is to receive a spiritual witness from God that it is true and accurate. However the term "spiritual witness" is often ill-defined. So I will turn to the Book of Mormon itself to show what this term means in the way that I am using it.
Mosiah 26:21
21 And he that will hear my voice shall be my sheep; and him shall ye receive into the church, and him will I also receive.
Alma 10:38
38 Behold, I say unto you, that the good shepherd doth call you; yea, and in his own name he doth call you, which is the name of Christ; and if ye will not hearken unto the voice of the good shepherd, to the name by which ye are called, behold, ye are not the sheep of the good shepherd.
So if you are already following the voice of the good shepherd that means you will recognize His voice coming from the Book of Mormon. However, if you recognize His voice but have self doubt, an additional promise is extended to you in the Book of Mormon.
Moroni 10:4
4 And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.
3 Book of Mormon External Evidences
3.1 Weapons and War
|
|
1 Nephi 4
2 Nephi 5
Jacob 1
Mosiah 1
Words of Mormon 13
|
|
Alma 43
Alma 49
Helaman 1
3 Nephi 4
Ether 15
Alma 28
Ether 11
Mormon 6
Alma 49
|
||||||||||||
|
Jarom 1
Mosiah 9
Alma 27
Alma 44
Alma 2
Alma 20
Alma 60
3 Nephi
Mormon 6
|
||||||||||
3.2 Mounds and Earthworks
Many people are unaware of the tremendous amount of ruins, artifacts, and remains of the ancient Nephites and Lamanites that have been found in America and Canada, especially by early settlers. There were many mounds and earthworks and fortifications and many books have been written about these — but it is not widely known. The first and most famous book is Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley: Comprising the Results of Extensive Original Surveys and Explorations (1848) by Ephraim George Squier and Edwin Hamilton Davis, with 306 pages, 48 lithographed maps and plates, and 207 wood engravings in the original book. This link is to a .pdf file scan of the original. A faster, easier version for viewing is found online. Below are two examples from the Book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alma 50
1 And now it came to pass that Moroni did not stop making preparations for war, or to defend his people against the
Lamanites; for he caused that his armies should commence in the commencement of the twentieth year of the reign of the judges,
that they should commence in digging up heaps of earth round about all the cities, throughout all the land which was possessed
by the Nephites.
2 And upon the top of these ridges of earth he caused that there should be timbers, yea, works of timbers built up to the
height of a man, round about the cities.
3 And he caused that upon those works of timbers there should be a frame of pickets built upon the timbers round about;
and they were strong and high.
4 And he caused towers to be erected that overlooked those works of pickets, and he caused places of security to be built
upon those towers, that the stones and the arrows of the Lamanites could not hurt them.
5 And they were prepared that they could cast stones from the top thereof, according to their pleasure and their
strength, and slay him who should attempt to approach near the walls of the city.
6 Thus Moroni did prepare strongholds against the coming of their enemies, round about every city in all the land.
2 Nephi 5
16 And I, Nephi, did build a temple; and I did construct it after the manner of the temple of Solomon save it were not
built of so many precious things; for they were not to be found upon the land, wherefore, it could not be built like unto
Solomon’s temple. But the manner of the construction was like unto the temple of Solomon; and the workmanship thereof was
exceedingly fine.
2 Nephi 53
3 And it came to pass that after the Lamanites had finished burying their dead and also the dead of the Nephites, they
were marched back into the land Bountiful; and Teancum, by the orders of Moroni, caused that they should commence laboring in
digging a ditch round about the land, or the city, Bountiful.
4 And he caused that they should build a breastwork of timbers upon the inner bank of the ditch; and they cast up dirt
out of the ditch against the breastwork of timbers; and thus they did cause the Lamanites to labor until they had encircled the
city of Bountiful round about with a strong wall of timbers and earth, to an exceeding height.
5 And this city became an exceeding stronghold ever after; and in this city they did guard the prisoners of the
Lamanites; yea, even within a wall which they had caused them to build with their own hands. Now Moroni was compelled to cause
the Lamanites to labor, because it was easy to guard them while at their labor; and he desired all his forces when he should
make an attack upon the Lamanites.
Note that in the following verses (Alma 47), the word “mount” in Bible-like English is a man-made structure and means “mound” in modern English.
Alma 47
5 And now he had got the command of those parts of the Lamanites who were in favor of the king; and he sought to gain
favor of those who were not obedient; therefore he went forward to the place which was called Oneidah, for thither had all the
Lamanites fled; for they discovered the army coming, and, supposing that they were coming to destroy them, therefore they fled
to Oneidah, to the place of arms.
6 And they had appointed a man to be a king and a leader over them, being fixed in their minds with a determined
resolution that they would not be subjected to go against the Nephites.
7 And it came to pass that they had gathered themselves together upon the top of the mount which was called Antipas, in
preparation to battle.
8 Now it was not Amalickiah’s intention to give them battle according to the commandments of the king; but behold, it
was his intention to gain favor with the armies of the Lamanites, that he might place himself at their head and dethrone the
king and take possession of the kingdom.
9 And behold, it came to pass that he caused his army to pitch their tents in the valley which was near the mount
Antipas.
10 And it came to pass that when it was night he sent a secret embassy into the mount Antipas, desiring that the leader
of those who were upon the mount, whose name was Lehonti, that he should come down to the foot of the mount, for he desired to
speak with him.
11 And it came to pass that when Lehonti received the message he durst not go down to the foot of the mount. And it came
to pass that Amalickiah sent again the second time, desiring him to come down. And it came to pass that Lehonti would not; and
he sent again the third time.
12 And it came to pass that when Amalickiah found that he could not get Lehonti to come down off from the mount, he went
up into the mount, nearly to Lehonti’s camp; and he sent again the fourth time his message unto Lehonti, desiring that he
would come down, and that he would bring his guards with him.
Alma 49
18 Now behold, the Lamanites could not get into their forts of security by any other way save by the entrance, because of
the highness of the bank which had been thrown up, and the depth of the ditch which had been dug round about, save it were by
the entrance.
19 And thus were the Nephites prepared to destroy all such as should attempt to climb up to enter the fort by any other
way, by casting over stones and arrows at them.
20 Thus they were prepared, yea, a body of their strongest men, with their swords and their slings, to smite down all who
should attempt to come into their place of security by the place of entrance; and thus were they prepared to defend themselves
against the Lamanites.
21 And it came to pass that the captains of the Lamanites brought up their armies before the place of entrance, and began
to contend with the Nephites, to get into their place of security; but behold, they were driven back from time to time,
insomuch that they were slain with an immense slaughter.
22 Now when they found that they could not obtain power over the Nephites by the pass, they began to dig down their banks
of earth that they might obtain a pass to their armies, that they might have an equal chance to fight; but behold, in these
attempts they were swept off by the stones and arrows which were thrown at them; and instead of filling up their ditches by
pulling down the banks of earth, they were filled up in a measure with their dead and wounded bodies.
23 Thus the Nephites had all power over their enemies; and thus the Lamanites did attempt to destroy the Nephites until
their chief captains were all slain; yea, and more than a thousand of the Lamanites were slain; while, on the other hand, there
was not a single soul of the Nephites which was slain.
The Story of Zelph
Heber C. Kimball
On Tuesday the 3rd we went up several of us with Joseph Smith Jr to the top of a mound on the bank of the Illinois river
which was several hundred feet above the river and from the summit of which we had a pleasant view of the surrounding country.
We could overlook the tops of the trees on to the meadow or prairie on each side the river as far as our eyes could extend
which was one of the most pleasant scenes I ever beheld. On the top of this mound there was the appearance of three altars
which had been built of stone one above another according to the ancient order and the ground was strewn over with human bones.
This caused in us very peculiar feelings to see the bones of our fellow creatures scattered in this manner who had been slain
in ages past. We felt prompted to dig down into the mound and sending for a shovel and hoe we proceeded to move away the earth.
At about one foot deep we discovered the skeleton of a man almost entire and between two of his ribs we found an Indian arrow
which had evidently been the cause of his death. We took the leg and thigh bones and carried them along with us to Clay county.
All four appeared sound. Elder B Young has yet the arrow in his possession. It is a common thing to find bones thus drenching
upon the earth in this country. The same day we pursued our journey. While on our way we felt anxious to know who the person
was who had been killed by that arrow. It was made known to Joseph that he had been an officer who fell in battle in the last
destruction among the Lamanites and his name was Zelph. This caused us to rejoice much to think that God was so mindful of us
as to show these things to his servant. Brother joseph had enquired of the lord and it was made known in a vision.
(
Times and Seasons, 1845, Extracts from Wilford Woodruffs Journal)
Heber C. Kimball
During our travels we visited many mounds thrown up by the ancient inhabitants of Nephites and Lamanites. This morning we
went unto a high mound near the river. Joseph and many of the brethren went up. This mound was very high. From the top of it we
could overlook the tops of the trees as far as our vision could extend and the scenery was truly delightful. On the top of the
mound were stones which presented the appearance of three alters having been erected one above the other according to the
ancient order of things and human bones were strewn upon the ground. We had taken a shovel along with us. Brother Joseph wished
us to dig into the mound. We dug into it about one foot and came upon the skeleton of a man almost entire and an arrow was
found sticking in his back bone. Elder Milton Holmes picked it out and brought it into camp with one of his leg bones which had
been broken. He put the leg bones in my wagon and I carried it to Clay County Missouri. Brother Joseph feeling anxious to learn
something governing the man prayed to the lord and the lord gave him a vision in open day while lying in his wagon. This mound
and his history was placed before him. His name was Zelph. He was a white Lamanite. The curse had been taken off from him
because of his faith and righteousness. He had embraced the gospel. He was a short stout thick set man. He had been a great
warrior, had joined the Nephites and fought for them under the direction of the great Onandagus who held sway and command over
the armies of the Nephites from the hill Cumorah and eastern sea to the rocky mountains. Though the Book of Mormon does not
speak of him, he was a great warrior leader and great prophet. Zelph had his thigh bone broken from the sling of a stone while
in battle. In the yr of his youth he was killed with the arrow sticking in his back bone. The vision of the great prophet at
the time that Zelph was killed was opened to the Prophet Joseph and their bodies were heaped upon the earth and that great
mound of near 300 feet high placed over them. I felt impressed to bury Zelphs thigh bone in temple block at Jackson County
Missouri but I did not have an opportunity and I brought it to clay county near the house owned by Colonel Arthur &
occupied by Lyman Wight.
(Wilford Woodruff, autobiographical account, recorded in his daily journals prepared
for publication by Matthias Mowley, The Deseret News, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1909, page 41)
![]() |
3.3 People and Events
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 Proboscidea, Equus and Bovidae
Elephant on gold coin — a shum of gold (Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ) Ether 9:19
|
Ether 9:19
|
In 2007 under the waters of Lake Michigan (the East Sea) divers found the "Mastodon Rock", an ancient American carving in granite rock. Notice how the tusk is trimmed, which is a sign of domestication. Since it is underwater it has not been validated by experts although most observers do believe it is a petroglyph. The photo is color-enhanced to highlight the features. |
Ether 9:18
|
1 Nephi 11:27
|
Alma 18:12
|
3.5 The Written Word
|
Enos 1
Alma 13
Alma 17
Alma 18
Alma 22
|
||
|
Alma 30
Alma 33
Mormon 9
How to Read the Michigan Tablets, by Brian Nettles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 Travel and Trade
(Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ). |
(Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ). |
Alma 63
|
(Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ). |
(Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ). |
Helaman 3
|
(Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ). |
(Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ). |
These from Ted Bell collection.. |
(Burrows Cave) *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. . |
(Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ). |
(Burrows Cave *Both Michigan Relics and Burrow Cave artifacts are controversial. Some assume they are all forgeries and others believe many pieces are authentic. In the case of the Michigan relics there are many thousands (est. 20,000) of relics from hundreds of people found over many years (since 1865) and in different locations, but mostly in upper Michigan. For Burrows Cave there are fewer relics (est. 3,000 rock carvings and 4,000 tablets) and fewer people involved and just one, undisclosed, location, Burrows Cave, located in Illinois. For background information, see the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave and Burrows Cave Artifacts. See also, The Mystic Symbol: Mark of the Michigan Mound Builders and Henriette Mertz. There is proof that some of the Michigan Relics, especially from the "Soper-Savage" collection were faked by James Scotford. This is enough for some to declare that any and all relics pointing to ancient civilization in America are fake, by definition. This theory is unwarranted. Many of the best relics found have a provenance completely independent of James Scotford and his acquaintances. Therefore each of the 1000's of relics, especially those with writing on them, deserve unbiased consideration without prejudice or animus. In my opinion, many relics have already been shown to be authentic in multiple ways. No known fake artifacts are presented on this site. Some that are in question are included. Let additional research continue. ). |
Jarom 1
|
|
|
Alma 11
|
|
In red, I have identified the modern equivalents on the map-stone as follows:
|
|
2 Nephi
Jarom 1
Mosiah 11
Ether 10
Helaman 3
4 Nephi 1
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
From John Lefgren, August 12, 2020 “During the last month, people have become aware of the health benefits from a plant that Dr. Kevin Price
discovered six weeks ago growing on the Zarahemla Temple Site.”
|
Alma 46
|
3.7 Walls of Zarahemla
Walls of Zarahemla
April 3 2022. Boots on the ground research work began for the wall foundations of Zarahemla. Timeline
The following has been reported from the expedition team:
Research is ongoing but so far I think there is a general consensus that these berms are man-made, not of modern construction, and have the potential to be part of the wall defenses of the ancient city of Zarahemla and that it is worth our continued study and exploration (especially when the weather is better). The berms are where we would expect the walls to be for the ancient city of Zarahemla. A description of the construction of defensive walls is given in the Book of Mormon. The image below is just one possible view of interpretation but it gives an idea of what we are considering and finding on the ground.
|
One one short expedition in March of 2022 has been undertaken so far to visually inspect a very short section of a wall berm that may have once formed a foundation for the walls of Zarahemla.
|

